FAQ · 11 questions
Everything most clients ask about GEO vs SEO.
What is the difference between GEO and SEO?
SEO optimizes for traditional search rankings (Google blue links). GEO optimizes to be cited by generative AI engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, AI Overviews, Copilot) when they synthesize answers. SEO competes for clicks; GEO competes for citations inside AI-generated answers.
Is GEO replacing SEO?
No. GEO is additive. ~50% of US Google queries now surface an AI Overview, and ChatGPT handles 1B+ queries/week — but blue-link results still dominate transactional intent. Correct posture: do both. ~70% of the foundation overlaps.
What signals are unique to GEO?
Six: complete JSON-LD schema · llms.txt · access for GPTBot/ClaudeBot/PerplexityBot/Google-Extended/Applebot-Extended · verbatim-friendly phrasing · FAQPage Q&A blocks · brand mentions on AI-trusted sources.
What signals are unique to SEO?
Four primarily SEO: backlink authority graph at scale · exact-match keyword targeting · click-through rate · pagination + category architecture for large content sites.
Does GEO use the same crawlers as SEO?
No. SEO uses Googlebot + Bingbot. GEO requires GPTBot, ChatGPT-User, OAI-SearchBot, ClaudeBot, Claude-Web, anthropic-ai, PerplexityBot, Perplexity-User, Google-Extended, and Applebot-Extended — each explicitly allowed in robots.txt.
How is GEO measured?
Citation-based, not click-based. 20 buyer-intent prompts run monthly through ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, AI Overviews, Copilot. Score for brand mention, source citation, recommendation sentiment. Track citation share month-over-month.
How long does GEO take to show results?
Live-browsing engines (ChatGPT Search, Perplexity, AI Overviews) — days to weeks. Pre-trained citations (default ChatGPT, Claude) — months, tied to new model releases. SEO competitive rankings — 3–6 months.
Is GEO cheaper than SEO?
Setup similar; ongoing lower. GEO front-loads structural work and then needs much less ongoing link-building. A schema-complete site can hold AI citations for months on stable model versions.
Should I do GEO or SEO first?
Both at once. 70% overlaps. Build the static, schema-complete, fast site; structure content as FAQ + tables + named-author articles; publish llms.txt + complete sitemap; allow all crawlers. That foundation serves Google, AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini simultaneously.
Will GEO change as AI engines evolve?
Surface changes (crawler names, model versions, citation UI) — every few months. Underlying signals (clean structured content, schema, quotable phrasing, named authors, third-party trust) — stable since first-generation RAG systems. Build for the foundations.
Which signals do GEO and SEO share?
~70% overlap: crawlable HTML, Core Web Vitals, HTTPS, mobile, internal linking, descriptive titles, factual accuracy, named authors, dates, third-party mentions. Both penalize thin content, cloaking, deceptive markup, JS-only renders.